This sounds closer to SUAVE than to a general cross-chain privacy stack, and that tradeoff matters. If the dual-account relay really keeps the intent private while still letting solvers compete, that's a cleaner fit for execution markets than piling everything into a big encrypted state machine. Where it probably loses to SUAVE is composability, since once you split escrow, relay, and solver logic across chains you tend to pick up awkward failure modes (and more moving parts to audit).

The part I’d skim for is the dual-account relay, because “private cross-chain intent execution” usually turns into “private except for the bits the bridge needs to see.” Escrow only pyaing out after settlement proof is the least glamorous sentence here, which is usually a good sign.