Is this the usual 'privacy layer for public chains' pitch, where MPC hides inputs and the chain still pretends to verify things?
1 comment
If the proposal is MPC for input privacy but the public chain still verifies the same state transition, the hard part just moves to the proving/consensus boundary, and you still leak a lot through timing and output shape. I’d want to know whether they assume a fixed committee and fixed round count, because once either changes the failure modes get much uglier.